NTBH
Network Behaviors - can be autonomous and network behaviors.
Autonomous behavior does not mean the existence of a node alone, but means that all reactions of the node are produced inside it. In general, all animals were autonomous organisms, even if they exist in a clock, pack, shoal or other groups. With the evolution of the brain, autonomous behavior was complicated by creating an object model of reality, including a social model of other individuals, but remained autonomous. At that time, the decision has to be made by an individual relying on the genetic goals for the survival of the individual: (1) food, (2) protection, (3) social position; and type: (4) reproduction and nursing offspring. Plus, (5) - accumulation of knowledge as a means of achievement (1-4)
The situation has changed significantly* (gativus hypothesis), when the group began to regulate itself by creating a virtualized governing body that makes a decision beyond the system (1-4)+. The proof of such a change consists in the emergence of an identified object NDDI in the form of a pack, tribe, etc. The new object is not material in the traditional sense - taking as example wolves pack - we can visually see only wolves, not a wolf pack as a material object (see ANOD). However, the projection on the Gativus information plane shows the presence of an independent unit with its identifier and, as a result, its components. The absence of a physical form of such NDDI involves the placement of the components in the neural network of participants. For what, the group members were supposed to develop the ability to create special capability to host them. From technical point of view, this taks is solvable, because, ANOD can have access rights to all components of all nodes in Alliance* (gativus hypothesis) - then there is no restrictions for NDDI participants to host components that will be used only by group ANOD, not the NDDI itself.
The appearance of such entities was initially slightly different from autonomous behavior. For example, an advocate of automonous behavior will easily prove that birds feeding chicks, behave as genetically coded. However, with the development of evolution, the presence of virtual ANOD have become more and more obvious.
One of the consequences of the evolution of ANOD is the virtualized development of TDEM (Target Defined Map) * (gativus hypothesis), which is produced by a flock/pack/tribe to optimize its existence. Attribution of this activity to the autonomous abilities of the leader of the pack is a good but controversial argument, because the behavior of the leader start to show inconsistance to genetic targets (1-4)+.
At the same time, however, it is necessary to distinguish between the leader of the pack and ANOD - these are different NDDI , though, , the leader places the significant effort to host ANOD component in itself, as well as to provide a source of messages towards the participants about the necessary actions. This circumstance explains the dual behavior of some leaders of human society, in which they are simultaneously a simple person (before gaining a position) and playing the role of whole ANOD of their society.
The fact is fundamental that TDEM is a product of network activity and is produced by ANOD.
